Grass Valley Forums Facebook   Twitter   YouTube  

Go Back   Grass Valley Forums > Converters > ADVC

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2008, 08:40 PM   #1
potawatamie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fremont,CA
Posts: 7
Default ADVC110 or ADVC300?

My analog capture died and I am looking for a replacement. My short list includes the ADVC110 and ADVC300. Is the ADVC300 as compared to the ADVC110 worth the higher cost? I know this is a hard question to answer.

I want to convert VHS tapes to DV. I have a good quality VHS deck with TBC but the tapes are 25-30 years old.

I do not need TBC from the ADVC300 but the signal processing could improve the quality of the capture. What kind of improvement and how much?

I use a little known editing program (EditStudio5) that allows me to reduce noise, do color balancing, color enhancement, etc of the converted digital data. I am sure analog processing can do a better job than digital filtering but how much better?

Any guidance/suggestions you can give me would be greatly appreciated.
potawatamie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 09:24 PM   #2
GrassValley_BH
Demystifier/Analogizer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 5,785
Default

Since your VCR already has a TBC, I'd go for a standalone video processor that can make the adjustments you want.

Thing with the ADVC300 is... you can't turn the ADVC300's TBC off.
GrassValley_BH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 11:23 PM   #3
potawatamie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fremont,CA
Posts: 7
Default

Hi Brandon,

Thanks for the reply.

This may be an awkward question for you to answer -- what standalone processors do you recommend -- or where should I look for recommendations? The little research I have done tells me it will be difficult to find something better than the Canopus products unless I pay quite a bit more.

What kind of adjustments should I look for? noise reduction? color enhancement? what else?

I can turn off TBC when using my VHS deck. Does that change your recommendation?
potawatamie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 11:35 PM   #4
GrassValley_BH
Demystifier/Analogizer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 5,785
Default

Unfortunately I don't have a ton of experience with standalone processors, though I do understand where you're coming from - there's a large range!

I'd look for something with 2D and 3D noise reduction, a full-frame TBC, and possibly some color control - it'll help especially for red bleed.

Where does the majority of your footage come from - off-air recordings, or camera-shot footage?
GrassValley_BH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 02:16 AM   #5
potawatamie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fremont,CA
Posts: 7
Default

All of the tapes I want to convert are from a camera. This is old stuff so it was shot with a vidicon tube I think (definitely not CCD) using a two-head recorder that was lugged about with an over-the-shoulder strap.

My, how things have changed.

One thing I miss from the old camera -- it had a great microphone.

Do you have any comments about the digital editing I mentioned? EditStudio has some great capabilities but I have not tried them to know how well they work.

I searched the net for processors that do 2D and 3D noise reduction. All I found was Canopus products, cheap boards with and without TV tuners, USB converters with MPEG encoders, and pro equipment that is way out of my price range. Bradon, what did you have in mind when you suggested a standalone video processor?

Last edited by potawatamie; 02-23-2008 at 07:41 AM. Reason: update to include results of online search
potawatamie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 12:45 PM   #6
kbosward
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 318
Default

Since your VCR has a TBC (I presume it is a full-frame TBC) then I would still go for the ADVC300, which has only a line TBC, and use its noise processing features.

It is far better to clean up the analog signal before converting to DV, rather than trying to clean up the DV (it's faster, too).

You can find some samples produced by Curt Wrigley of the ADVC300 filtering here:
http://www.adobeforums.com/webx?14@@.3c06061a/17

or here:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showpost....9&postcount=13

Ken.
kbosward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 09:57 PM   #7
potawatamie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fremont,CA
Posts: 7
Default

Hi Ken,

Thanks for the links. The increase in clarity is impressive.

I checked the specifications for my deck and I had forgotten the deck has more going for it than I remembered. It is a Panasonic AG-1908P. Some of its features:
* full-field TBC
* digital noise reduction
* 3-D Y/C separation

The ADC300 might be able to improve some of my tapes even more with 3DNR.

If the ADVC300 processing could be turned off (so it acted like the ADVC110) I would not hesitate to buy it. But I have been told its TBC and filtering cannot be turned off. Can its processing can be turned down enough when it is not wanted?

I could turn off the processing on my deck but that seems to be a waste. Any thoughts?

Thanks for your comments,
Dave
potawatamie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 09:45 AM   #8
GrassValley_BH
Demystifier/Analogizer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 5,785
Default

I'd play a sampling of your current tapes out to a TV with the VCR's filtering on and see how it does. If it's still pretty bad, then I'd definitely go with the ADVC300. If it's pretty good, then it's not so cut-and-dry...
GrassValley_BH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 01:30 AM   #9
kbosward
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 318
Default

Sorry, I have no further thoughts in addition to doing the test that Brandon suggested. You have a difficult decision! I think the ADVC300 is very good and I have not experienced any issues that I am aware of due to not being able to turn the ADVC300's line TBC off. You have a good VCR (I think you meant AG-1980P) with a full TBC and that is essential for getting the best signal off the tape. Make sure you use the S-video connection from the VCR to the ADVC -- even though the original tapes are only VHS and not S-VHS, I have found that using the S-video connection reduces colour fringing on edges.

If you had the ADVC300, you could then experiment with using your VCR's noise processing features or those of the ADVC300. This important thing is to do the processing in the analog space, not after the capture is done.

Ken.

Last edited by kbosward; 02-25-2008 at 01:37 AM.
kbosward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 06:23 AM   #10
potawatamie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fremont,CA
Posts: 7
Default

Dear Brandon and Ken,

Thank you for your suggestions. You are correct Ken, the model is AG-1980P.

I hope you will stay with me just a bit longer on this. There is not much more to try but I would appreciate your opinions.

I tried switching TBC in and out and I did not see any difference. I guess that means either the tapes are in good shape or TBC is not working. The picture is very stable. The operating instructions say TBC normally should be turned OFF but can be used if the picture shakes from side to side.

There are no switches to turn on/off noise reduction.

There is slider to adjust picture sharpness. The mid-way setting seems to be best for most situations.

I am using the S-Video output. The picture quality is good when it was shot in good light. In low light, of course, the picture is noisy and the color is bland. I guess I do not need much if any processing for shots in good lighting.

The two questions I have are:

(1) Do you think the ADVC300 would help much with the low-light shots? Otherwise, I could play back in black and white to reduce the noise.

(2) Can the ADVC300 processing be turned down enough not to degrade the pictures that already have good quality?

Thanks so much for your thoughts.

Dave
potawatamie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
 
Go Back   Grass Valley Forums > Converters > ADVC
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is ADVC300 suitable for my purpose? rhubear ADVC 3 04-19-2008 03:22 PM
Final Cut Pro & ADVC300 Set uo rick200017 ADVC 0 04-03-2008 02:11 AM
ADVC110 vs. ADVC300 SteveCA ADVC 19 12-04-2007 07:38 PM
ADVC300: Best settings for capturing from perfect sources hysteriah ADVC 5 10-08-2007 08:35 PM
using ADVC300 or NX for component out to external monitor T-Bone ADVC 6 10-02-2007 09:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Copyright © 2014 Belden Inc. All rights reserved.