View Single Post
Old 06-08-2019, 04:00 PM   #7
BernH
Senior Member
 
BernH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: St. John's, NL, Canada
Posts: 1,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ulyssesvideo View Post
if you buy a proper usb 4 ssd portable drive (not in a cradle) when available connected into a card designed for usb4 that connects directly into the motherboard... I think it will out perform your config....
at the end of the day.. its getting faster and better.... and your current setup in that video.. will be out of date.
yeah.. your right.... may not make ANY different in speed if you refer your video... but as video files get larger ie 6k or 8k etc... you will want a faster connection... yours wont cut it that well.

thanks
It will only perform better if the actual drive in the housing can provide the bandwidth.

Regardless of the 40Gb/s theoretical limit of the bus, unless the bus can be saturated by the device, you are not running at the maximum speed of the bus.

If the bus is faster than a single device, splitting the bandwidth across multiple devices can allow for bus saturation (ie. RAID-0 configuration with drives)

You have to remember, "a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link" In this case the single SSD speed is the weakest link. To saturate 40Gb/s you would need a much faster drive than is currently available, or an array of multiple drives.
__________________
Edius WG 9.50.5351, various 3rd party plugins, VisTitle 2.8, Win 7 Ultimate SP1, i7-4790K @ 4GHz with HD4600 GPU embedded, MSI Z97 Gaming 7 Motherboard, 32GB Kingston HyperX RAM, nVidia GTX680 4GB GPU, Matrox MX02 Mini MAX, Corsair 750W PSU, Corsair H110i GT Water Cooler, Corsair C70 case, 4TB Internal RAID 0/stripe (2x2TB Seagate SATAIII HDD's, Win7 Software RAID 0/stripe), 1TB Crucial MX500 SSD, Pioneer BDR-207D, Dual 1920x1080 monitors (one on GTX680 and one on Intel HD4600).
BernH is offline