Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thumb drive delivery

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Haddock View Post
    Here is the speed to copy from my HDD to the USB3 key (Kingstone) : 10.100 kbites/sec.

    What do you think about ?
    Are you sure that you've written down that speed correctly?

    That is amazingly slow.

    Remember that bytes and bits are two different things and that your storage device is probably measuring in 8bit bytes, or an 8bit word length.

    I have USB flash drives that read and transfer anywhere between 80 to about 400 MB/s, that's megabytes.

    Also. When something is written as MB or KB the large B usually means the measurement is in Bytes and anything written Mb or Kb with a small b would usually mean bits.

    Cheers,
    Dave.

    "There's only one thing more powerful than knowledge. The free sharing of it"


    If you don't know the difference between Azimuth and Asimov, then either your tapes sound bad and your Robot is very dangerous. Kill all humans...... Or your tape deck won't harm a human, and your Robot's tracking and stereo imagining is spot on.

    Is your Robot three laws safe?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Haddock View Post
      In fact, in my house I have 2 SmartTV's. Both accept the USB3.... so, again right you are. It's just that a client has problem to read the USB3 on his living room TV. After a test on his sleeproom TV, it was working.... may be a bad conclusion from my side.

      In fact also, I do as you, using USB3... and don't have any other complain.

      It seems that NTFS is not easy to read on every TV. So I prefer to stay on FAT32 with the respect of 4 GB limitation per file.
      yes, and FAT32 can be read by MAC as well
      Anton Strauss
      Antons Video Productions - Sydney

      EDIUS X WG with BM Mini Monitor 4k and BM Mini Recorder, Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro, Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, 32 Threads @ 4.3Ghz, Corsair Water Cooling, Gigabyte RTX-2070 Super 3X 8GB Video Card, Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD for System, 8TB Samsung Raid0 SSD for Video, 2 Pioneer BDR-209 Blu-ray/DVD burners, Hotswap Bay for 3.5" Sata and 2.5" SSD, Phanteks Enthoo Pro XL Tower, Corsair 32GB DDR4 Ram, Win10 Pro

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Haddock View Post
        Here is the speed to copy from my HDD to the USB3 key (Kingstone) : 10.100 kbites/sec.

        What do you think about ?
        that is bad speed, I get 24 write and 105 read using HP 16GB sticks
        Attached Files
        Anton Strauss
        Antons Video Productions - Sydney

        EDIUS X WG with BM Mini Monitor 4k and BM Mini Recorder, Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro, Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, 32 Threads @ 4.3Ghz, Corsair Water Cooling, Gigabyte RTX-2070 Super 3X 8GB Video Card, Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD for System, 8TB Samsung Raid0 SSD for Video, 2 Pioneer BDR-209 Blu-ray/DVD burners, Hotswap Bay for 3.5" Sata and 2.5" SSD, Phanteks Enthoo Pro XL Tower, Corsair 32GB DDR4 Ram, Win10 Pro

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by antonsvideo View Post
          yes, and FAT32 can be read by MAC as well
          As can NTFS. You would have to go back 10+ years to find a Mac that cannot READ NTFS.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by DigitalDave View Post
            As can NTFS. You would have to go back 10+ years to find a Mac that cannot READ NTFS.
            so why do I need to install Macdrive on WinPC in order to view Mac formatted NTFS? are they using very old Macs?
            Anton Strauss
            Antons Video Productions - Sydney

            EDIUS X WG with BM Mini Monitor 4k and BM Mini Recorder, Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro, Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, 32 Threads @ 4.3Ghz, Corsair Water Cooling, Gigabyte RTX-2070 Super 3X 8GB Video Card, Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD for System, 8TB Samsung Raid0 SSD for Video, 2 Pioneer BDR-209 Blu-ray/DVD burners, Hotswap Bay for 3.5" Sata and 2.5" SSD, Phanteks Enthoo Pro XL Tower, Corsair 32GB DDR4 Ram, Win10 Pro

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by antonsvideo View Post
              so why do I need to install Macdrive on WinPC in order to view Mac formatted NTFS? are they using very old Macs?
              Yes drives formatted on a Mac are a different ballgame and I too have used macdrive for many years...BUT all but the early generation Macs will READ PC formatted NTFS.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by DigitalDave View Post
                Yes drives formatted on a Mac are a different ballgame and I too have used macdrive for many years...BUT all but the early generation Macs will READ PC formatted NTFS.
                I just tested an NTFS formatted stick on my neighbors Macbook and it worked

                However, if some TV will not accept NTFS, then Fat32 may still be the best option
                Anton Strauss
                Antons Video Productions - Sydney

                EDIUS X WG with BM Mini Monitor 4k and BM Mini Recorder, Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro, Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, 32 Threads @ 4.3Ghz, Corsair Water Cooling, Gigabyte RTX-2070 Super 3X 8GB Video Card, Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD for System, 8TB Samsung Raid0 SSD for Video, 2 Pioneer BDR-209 Blu-ray/DVD burners, Hotswap Bay for 3.5" Sata and 2.5" SSD, Phanteks Enthoo Pro XL Tower, Corsair 32GB DDR4 Ram, Win10 Pro

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by antonsvideo View Post
                  I just tested an NTFS formatted stick on my neighbors Macbook and it worked

                  However, if some TV will not accept NTFS, then Fat32 may still be the best option
                  Don't be so surprised. It's been that way for 10 years. Macs could read but not write NTFS.

                  In the "Old Days", if Mac customers wanting film or video transferred to a Hard Drive,I would copy to an NTFS drive for them to copy to their own Mac Formatted Drive. Of course MacDrive and more recently exFat changed all that.
                  With regard to TVs not reading NTFS, sure it may have been the case with the first generation sets but not today. As I have previously stated, I ONLY use NTFS, without any issues, 100% cross platform and across all TVs I have encountered. The thought of being at the mercy of Fat32 is totally unacceptable. I would add (again) that exFat is still not the norm on SOME so called new TVs, probably with older technology inside.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Most Macs will read NTFS drives but won't write to them without extra software.

                    In my experience Windows has never had compatibility with Mac Journald (native) formats without extra software (or at least the main ones)

                    For Windows and Mac cross platform drives (data drives not OS) exFat is the one to use. This would also help with Linux, Android, Chrome and most other Linux variants.

                    NTFS is the rarest compatibility within TV media devices and many other domestic video playback devices. Although, from what David has said this has changed with recent/modern UHD TVs. This is due to licensing (MS I think). Just bare in mind though, many people use video boxes to access content even though their TVs may have USB sockets capable of direct media access and there are way more older TVs out there than new ones.

                    The two most common formats for video playback type devices are Fat32 and exFat, with exFat having the obvious advantages. Other Fat formats may work but are not really recommended due to other limitations.

                    As for USB 2 or 3. The best option is to encode to a bitrate that will work from a USB 2 interface and USB 2 flash drive, regardless of if it's stored on a USB 3 drive or USB 2 drive. The reason is that the huge majority of USB interfaces on domestic video type devices, including many older TVs, will only be USB 2.

                    Also make sure that your USB sticks don't have any partitions or a security partition/rom, many domestic video type devices won't get past the first partition unless it's a USB drive or a SSD based USB stick, although this can still be problematic on many devices that don't use a typical computer OS.

                    Also make sure that your USB storage devices, regardless of being sticks (flash drives) or hard drives, are using MBR. It's possible to have either MBR or GPT on USB devices but many devices other than typical computer OSs may have issues with GPT.

                    Because of all these issues and especially if you'd like to deliver just one file, using X264 is a must, with HandBrake being the easiest X264 encoder and it's also free.

                    Using chapter markers in an MP4 file may be an option for delivering a single file, although this can still be problematic with certain playback devices, as some may see the video file but not the chapters.

                    Regardless of everything mentioned in this thread, there will still be the odd issue with client playback using MP4 delivered on USB.

                    "There's only one thing more powerful than knowledge. The free sharing of it"


                    If you don't know the difference between Azimuth and Asimov, then either your tapes sound bad and your Robot is very dangerous. Kill all humans...... Or your tape deck won't harm a human, and your Robot's tracking and stereo imagining is spot on.

                    Is your Robot three laws safe?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Liverpool TV View Post
                      Are you sure that you've written down that speed correctly?

                      That is amazingly slow.

                      Remember that bytes and bits are two different things and that your storage device is probably measuring in 8bit bytes, or an 8bit word length.

                      I have USB flash drives that read and transfer anywhere between 80 to about 400 MB/s, that's megabytes.

                      Also. When something is written as MB or KB the large B usually means the measurement is in Bytes and anything written Mb or Kb with a small b would usually mean bits.

                      Cheers,
                      Dave.
                      Yesss , right you are. I suppose it's 10 Mbits. Compare to transfert rates going to my Synology NAS (via intranet) wich is around 9 times more speed (90 MB/s). It's seems that the price and quality of the USB3 key may influence the speed of recording.
                      (http://usb3speed.nirsoft.net/)
                      Yvon durieux alias "Haddock" Belgium GMT + 2

                      Sorry for my poor english, I am french native speaking

                      Main System: Azus Z87 Pro, [email protected], 16gb ram, Nvidia GeForce GT 630, Windows 7 Pro 64, Samsung 840 pro, Edius 8.53.2808 WG and 9.54.6706 + NXexpress or HDspark, 2T separate video SSD.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by antonsvideo View Post
                        that is bad speed, I get 24 write and 105 read using HP 16GB sticks
                        Yess its slow. Is a Kingston 16 GB (13 €). To read video of VHS genuine quality (or Hi8) the MP4 export od Edius is set on 7 MB.

                        I export first on HD then start a copy on the Key while Edius is exporting the second one... and so on.

                        Looking here : http://usb3speed.nirsoft.net/ and here https://www.kingston.com/fr/usb/pers...siness/dtse9g2 : it seems that the Kingston can read at max 100 MB while writting at max 15 MB.

                        Difficult to compare without taking price in account
                        Last edited by Haddock; 11-17-2018, 11:04 AM.
                        Yvon durieux alias "Haddock" Belgium GMT + 2

                        Sorry for my poor english, I am french native speaking

                        Main System: Azus Z87 Pro, [email protected], 16gb ram, Nvidia GeForce GT 630, Windows 7 Pro 64, Samsung 840 pro, Edius 8.53.2808 WG and 9.54.6706 + NXexpress or HDspark, 2T separate video SSD.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by antonsvideo View Post
                          However, if some TV will not accept NTFS, then Fat32 may still be the best option
                          I think that it's beter to stay on FAT32... it goes everywhere and I never know the specifications of the materiel used by my client...

                          And new key's are genuine done in that format
                          Yvon durieux alias "Haddock" Belgium GMT + 2

                          Sorry for my poor english, I am french native speaking

                          Main System: Azus Z87 Pro, [email protected], 16gb ram, Nvidia GeForce GT 630, Windows 7 Pro 64, Samsung 840 pro, Edius 8.53.2808 WG and 9.54.6706 + NXexpress or HDspark, 2T separate video SSD.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            All observations and remarks of Liverpool TV are pertinent...

                            Thanks for this long post
                            Yvon durieux alias "Haddock" Belgium GMT + 2

                            Sorry for my poor english, I am french native speaking

                            Main System: Azus Z87 Pro, [email protected], 16gb ram, Nvidia GeForce GT 630, Windows 7 Pro 64, Samsung 840 pro, Edius 8.53.2808 WG and 9.54.6706 + NXexpress or HDspark, 2T separate video SSD.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Haddock View Post
                              All observations and remarks of Liverpool TV are pertinent...

                              Thanks for this long post
                              You're most certainly welcome Yvon.

                              Cheers,
                              Dave.

                              "There's only one thing more powerful than knowledge. The free sharing of it"


                              If you don't know the difference between Azimuth and Asimov, then either your tapes sound bad and your Robot is very dangerous. Kill all humans...... Or your tape deck won't harm a human, and your Robot's tracking and stereo imagining is spot on.

                              Is your Robot three laws safe?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X