Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Neat Video rendering times

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Neat Video rendering times

    Anyone here who has tested different graphics cards with Neat Video?

    Thank you for all infos in advance.

  • #2
    Wow that is a real question
    From what I have seen, nvidea GTX works better than a AMD card, but that was a little while ago
    Here are a couple of results that surprised me
    Both my main system and lap top have the "same" GPU GTX970, the laptop has an "M" version

    Project setting 1080 50p
    Main system uses 8 cores plus GPU for 4.52 fps
    Laptop uses 7 cores plus GPU for 11.8fps

    Project setting 1080 50i
    Main system uses 9 cores plus GPU for 9.5fps
    Laptop uses 7 cores plus GPU for 12.4fps

    Surprised me but the main system is getting rather old has 6 core CPU running at 4Ghz, (see signature) while the laptop has a 4 core CPU running at 2.6G - 3.6 turbo
    Hope that helps
    Barry
    Win 10HP, EDIUS WG9.4, HD Spark, Boris RED 5, VMW6, Authorworks 6, Bluff Titler, VisTitler 2.8, NEAT 3/4, Mercalli 2/4, Vitascene, Izotope RX6 Plugin, NewBlue, Trend Micro AV
    GB GA-X58A-UD3R MB, i7 [email protected], 12G 1600mhz Mem, Samsung EVO-250G SSD, 3x2T RAID, GTX 970W OC, 2x24 inch LG Monitors
    Canon XH-A1/ Canon HF-G30, GoPro Hero3 Black, Edit @1920 50p HQ preset

    https://vimeo.com/user2157719/videos
    Laptop ASUS G752VT-GC060T Win 10HP, Edius WG8.53 Samsung M2 SSD 256G+1Tb HD,

    Comment


    • #3
      After upgrading my CPU to a 10 core model the performance in Neat Video dramatically improved. I am sure it would be better with a more current GPU but that will have to wait. As stated above, don't forget about the CPU in the equation.
      Asus Prime X299-A - Intel i9 7900x all cores @4.3GHz 2 cores @4.5GHz - 32GB RAM - NVidia GTX1070 - Edius 9 WG - BM Intensity 4k - Boris RED - Vitascene 2 - Windows 10

      Comment


      • #4
        Thank you for your observations.

        I really would like to know:

        1. How much faster will a GTX 1080 be compared to a GTX 1060?

        2. How many CPU cores are useful?

        Comment


        • #5
          I would e-mail Vlad at Neat Video. He would have the best perspective.
          Asus Prime X299-A - Intel i9 7900x all cores @4.3GHz 2 cores @4.5GHz - 32GB RAM - NVidia GTX1070 - Edius 9 WG - BM Intensity 4k - Boris RED - Vitascene 2 - Windows 10

          Comment


          • #6
            I have just got a MSI 1080Ti so have not done lots of tests yet. However anything that uses NVENC or CUDA cores will have 3 times the processing power from the 1080Ti compared to the 1060. That has to have a big effect. I have only tested encoding times for h265 with NVENC with TMPGenc 6 or with x265 on my system. NVENC encode for a 22 min 23G UHD 60P file from my GH5 was 25 mins and the x265 which would just use my i7 4790K estimated 7 hours and 26 mins !!! File size came down to 9G from the 23G which was my reason for trying. On the timeline I compared to the original and that looks good for my purposes. I was looking for a way to archive a nice file rather than keep the original.
            Ron Evans

            Threadripper 1920 stock clock 3.7, Gigabyte Designare X399 MB, 32G G.Skill 3200CL14, 500G M.2 NVME OS, 500G EVO 850 temp. 1T EVO 850 render, 6T Source, 2 x 1T NVME, MSI 1080Ti 11G , EVGA 850 G2, LG BLuray Burner, BM IP4K, WIN10 Pro, Shuttle Pro2

            ASUS PB328 monitor, BenQ BL2711U 4K preview monitor, EDIUS X, 9.5 WG, Vegas 18, Resolve Studio 17


            Cameras: GH5S, GH5, FDR-AX100, FDR-AX53, DJI OSMO Pocket, Atomos Ninja V x 2

            Comment

            Working...
            X