Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is TMP5 necessary anymore?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is TMP5 necessary anymore?

    With Edius 6, is it necessary to process video in TMP5 anymore? Is there any advantage HD to SD or other codecs where TMP5 is better than Edius 6?
    EDIUS Workgroups 8 with NX Hardware plus HD expansion Card,
    EDITHD Workstation: Intel Core i7 [email protected], Nvidia GTX-950 Video Card, Windows 7 Premium, 64bit, 6GB Ram, Vistitle 2.6.0.6, Robuskey, ChromaKeyer Pro,

  • #2
    Where you have a long program and thus need 2 pass VBR to get the most out of the low bit rate.

    Ron Evans
    Ron Evans

    Threadripper 1920 stock clock 3.7, Gigabyte Designare X399 MB, 32G G.Skill 3200CL14, 500G M.2 NVME OS, 500G EVO 850 temp. 1T EVO 850 render, 16T Source, 2 x 1T NVME, MSI 1080Ti 11G , EVGA 850 G2, LG BLuray Burner, BM IP4K, WIN10 Pro, Shuttle Pro2

    ASUS PB328 monitor, BenQ BL2711U 4K preview monitor, EDIUS X, 9.5 WG, Vegas 18, Resolve Studio 18


    Cameras: GH5S, GH6, FDR-AX100, FDR-AX53, DJI OSMO Pocket, Atomos Ninja V x 2

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Ron Evans
      Where you have a long program and thus need 2 pass VBR to get the most out of the low bit rate.

      Ron Evans
      Good advice. I've been experimenting with quicktime files. And it looks like a big improvement over 5.5 in making smaller file sizes that look very good.
      EDIUS Workgroups 8 with NX Hardware plus HD expansion Card,
      EDITHD Workstation: Intel Core i7 [email protected], Nvidia GTX-950 Video Card, Windows 7 Premium, 64bit, 6GB Ram, Vistitle 2.6.0.6, Robuskey, ChromaKeyer Pro,

      Comment


      • #4
        This is a personal choice. In my testing, T5 still beats Edius 6 even at high bitrates. This is due to adding filters like Cotour and Color Correction in T5 to enhance the SD file.

        T5 also has the best downsampling which gets rid of jaggies. So for me, T5 is still part of my workflow. Export an HD Canopus Lossess file from the timline - make BD & DVD from this file. I just learned one can open two instances of T5 at once so I can now make both files at the same time. (This is for mpeg-2 encoding as it uses less CPU than mpeg-4).
        Asus PrimeZ690A - Intel i9 13900K - 32GB RAM - NVidia GTX1070 - Edius X WG - BM Intensity 4k - Boris RED - Vitascene 2 - Windows 11

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bassman
          I just learned one can open two instances of T5 at once so I can now make both files at the same time. (This is for mpeg-2 encoding as it uses less CPU than mpeg-4).
          Correct, a real time saver :)

          My workflow will remain to export a HQfine AVI from the Edius timeline, only then you can convert multiple files at the same time in T5, if you export from time line you can only do one at the time.
          Tony D.

          EDIUS WG 9.54 / MATROX MXO2 LE / WIN10 Pro WS / LENOVO P71 Workstation laptop / XEON E3-1535M v6 / nVidia QUADRO P3000 6GB / Toshiba M.2 NVMe 512GB / 2x Samsung 860 EVO 4TB / 32GB ECC RAM.
          EDIUS WG 8.53 / HDRX-E1 + HDBX-1000H / WIN10 Pro / DUAL XEON X5470 / SUPERMICRO X7DWA-N / SUPERMICRO SUPERCHASIS SC745TQ-920B / INTEL 520 SSD 240GB / WD CAVIAR BLACK 4TB (many) / 32GB ECC RAM / GTX 770 4GB / 2x MOTU 896HD.
          wavearts / neatvideo / tmpgenc / hitfilm / imaginate / affinity

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by digitalgecko
            With Edius 6, is it necessary to process video in TMP5 anymore? Is there any advantage HD to SD or other codecs where TMP5 is better than Edius 6?
            It was never really needed as a necessity but more for users who are after the holy grail :)

            E6 produces pretty good results and often (almost always) the client can't tell the difference, only when they are told where to look they might see it.
            Often its the producing team that cares most regarding extreme quality, the average viewer is only interested in the story that is told.

            Therefore there is no easy answer to this question, it's personal, really.
            If you often get 'problem' sources from you clients it well worth it to have T5 as it's like Anton like to call it 'my swish army knife' for video, it can really do a lot.

            If you have PC3 should you buy it, I don't think so.
            The main question should be If you want to 'tinker' to improve already great results ..............
            Tony D.

            EDIUS WG 9.54 / MATROX MXO2 LE / WIN10 Pro WS / LENOVO P71 Workstation laptop / XEON E3-1535M v6 / nVidia QUADRO P3000 6GB / Toshiba M.2 NVMe 512GB / 2x Samsung 860 EVO 4TB / 32GB ECC RAM.
            EDIUS WG 8.53 / HDRX-E1 + HDBX-1000H / WIN10 Pro / DUAL XEON X5470 / SUPERMICRO X7DWA-N / SUPERMICRO SUPERCHASIS SC745TQ-920B / INTEL 520 SSD 240GB / WD CAVIAR BLACK 4TB (many) / 32GB ECC RAM / GTX 770 4GB / 2x MOTU 896HD.
            wavearts / neatvideo / tmpgenc / hitfilm / imaginate / affinity

            Comment


            • #7
              STEP by STEP E6>T5>DVD conversion

              You guys are right E6 does produce excellent results.

              Only last night I downloaded the demo of T5 and did a side by side comparison. I couldn't see the difference. I'm reckon though I may have not had all the setting correct.

              Any of you guys happy to share your step by steps in order to do this?

              I would greatly apprecate it. I tried to find Anton's forumla (the big long one "that gives great results" but couldn't find it on the forum.

              Thanks as I am real keen to see if there is any difference and for me a small improvement would be worth it.

              What I did notice with T5 was that the encode happened real quick. Seemed quicker than Procoder so thats a really good thing.

              Ron, I can totally relate to what you were saying in another post where you said T5 dual pass improves the close ups of faces. Like yourself I do multicam shoots of theatre shows and it kills me see fuzzy smiles of all the dancers.

              Bring on Blu-ray!

              Comment


              • #8
                Did you see this from Anton?

                TmpgEnc Video Mastering Works 5 Tutorial for downscalong EDIUS Pal or NTSC HD to Pal or NTSC SD with no artifacts, ideal for DVD production
                Tony




                Fractal Design Define XL R2 Full tower- Asrock Z490 Taichi - i9-10850K -- 250GB 860 EVO- 32GBVengeance LPX- Blackmagic IP4K-- Geforce GTX 1070 Founders Edition -- EVGA G3 850 PSU-- Corsair H100i Pro XT- LG Blu-Ray writer- MxM PCI-e Reader-- EDIUS X WG- Win 10 Pro 64bit.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Antons settings

                  Thanks for that. I will try it out.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hutch TV
                    Thanks for that. I will try it out.
                    No bother, works great for me.
                    Tony




                    Fractal Design Define XL R2 Full tower- Asrock Z490 Taichi - i9-10850K -- 250GB 860 EVO- 32GBVengeance LPX- Blackmagic IP4K-- Geforce GTX 1070 Founders Edition -- EVGA G3 850 PSU-- Corsair H100i Pro XT- LG Blu-Ray writer- MxM PCI-e Reader-- EDIUS X WG- Win 10 Pro 64bit.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As Tony stated, I see T5 as the best qulity search, but...it takes a long time for the files to encode for DVD. I always use 2-pass VBR and use these filters: Contour for sharpening and color correction for some saturation increase. I see a quality drop from changing the AVI decoder that Anton mentions so I stay with the default. Long but a finished product is set in stone after it is delivered, might as well go for the glory.

                      I use all of Anton's settings for the encoder and they are for the best quality.
                      Asus PrimeZ690A - Intel i9 13900K - 32GB RAM - NVidia GTX1070 - Edius X WG - BM Intensity 4k - Boris RED - Vitascene 2 - Windows 11

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      😀
                      🥰
                      🤢
                      😎
                      😡
                      👍
                      👎