Anyone using the 5900x or 5950x with Edius X?
Aside from H.265/264, when using codecs that are CPU decoded such as HQX or any codecs that utilise GPU such as PR/RAW etc. Basically any codec that doesn’t utilise QS via an Intel CPU. What is the timeline performance like in Edius X?
Compared to a typical Intel setup does Edius X utilise the processing power of the new AMD CPUs as far as FX etc. are concerned? How does Edius X utilise all the cores/threads of these processors, especially the 16/32 cores/threads of the 5950X?
I’ve had a 5950X on back order now for ages so am still unable to test with Edius X. I’ll be pairing this CPU with an RTX 3080 or 3090 GPU as my main post system. While the system will be for a bunch of post things, Edius is by far my most used application and it would be great if it could utilise this new system.
I appreciate that the GPU abilities of this system will be quite redundant with Edius, aside from NVENc and the odd filter but I’m quite hopeful that Edius X’s basic edit and timeline render functions would benefit from the AMD CPU with appropriate codecs.
Probably like many other Edius users, it’s getting quite depressing looking at building a new Intel system. Even though Intel’s Gen11 desktop CPUs are just around the corner, these CPUs are still based on older Skylake tech and their performance won’t be much of an increase over Gen10, which wasn’t all that much better than Gen9.
While proper GPU utilisation is where Edius X should be, as has been stated in many other posts. I’m wondering if Edius X will utilise the new AMD CPUs, hence this post.
Also. GV really should be answering these types of questions and other system based questions that appear on the forum. Edius simply doesn’t have anywhere near the market share of the other pro NLEs and as such there is nowhere near the same amount of user testing that happens with other NLEs. So, trying to find answers about real world use of Edius is nowhere near as easy as other pro NLEs, this is why GV should be far more active in supporting its users.
Any input from GV would be greatly appreciated.
Aside from H.265/264, when using codecs that are CPU decoded such as HQX or any codecs that utilise GPU such as PR/RAW etc. Basically any codec that doesn’t utilise QS via an Intel CPU. What is the timeline performance like in Edius X?
Compared to a typical Intel setup does Edius X utilise the processing power of the new AMD CPUs as far as FX etc. are concerned? How does Edius X utilise all the cores/threads of these processors, especially the 16/32 cores/threads of the 5950X?
I’ve had a 5950X on back order now for ages so am still unable to test with Edius X. I’ll be pairing this CPU with an RTX 3080 or 3090 GPU as my main post system. While the system will be for a bunch of post things, Edius is by far my most used application and it would be great if it could utilise this new system.
I appreciate that the GPU abilities of this system will be quite redundant with Edius, aside from NVENc and the odd filter but I’m quite hopeful that Edius X’s basic edit and timeline render functions would benefit from the AMD CPU with appropriate codecs.
Probably like many other Edius users, it’s getting quite depressing looking at building a new Intel system. Even though Intel’s Gen11 desktop CPUs are just around the corner, these CPUs are still based on older Skylake tech and their performance won’t be much of an increase over Gen10, which wasn’t all that much better than Gen9.
While proper GPU utilisation is where Edius X should be, as has been stated in many other posts. I’m wondering if Edius X will utilise the new AMD CPUs, hence this post.
Also. GV really should be answering these types of questions and other system based questions that appear on the forum. Edius simply doesn’t have anywhere near the market share of the other pro NLEs and as such there is nowhere near the same amount of user testing that happens with other NLEs. So, trying to find answers about real world use of Edius is nowhere near as easy as other pro NLEs, this is why GV should be far more active in supporting its users.
Any input from GV would be greatly appreciated.
Comment