4.61 released!

[SoundFreak]

Only GV can answer that, but it looks that all the remaining issues and our wish list is being forward to the next version, and not the next update.

[fukly]

so we realy have to wait for the edius 5 to get avchd improvement?
next nab?? hope it won't be that long

[xmanflash]

so we realy have to wait for the edius 5 to get avchd improvement?
next nab?? hope it won't be that long

I would think that maybe AVCHD would be more appropriate for Edius Neo wouldnt it? - We use a Sony AVCHD cam with Neo and it rocks compared to Vegas and Premier - but of course we have to convert to HQ first..

Anyhow - Anything that Neo gets will probably be in Edius anyhow (being they are the same engine), so my *guess* is that it may be supported more adequately on both platforms this year. (sooon)

[vienna1944er]

but of course we have to convert to HQ first..

hmmmm ..please can you tell me, which Cam, which format 1440 or 1920, 50 or 60 frames, and what for "convert" procedure ??

a) convert per export to file
b) convert in bin per contex >> to HQ
c) convert per AVCHD2HQ converter (newest version)

variant "c" makes problems (for my SR11 files and .....I am not alone...)
curiosity ... same file ....6 enconding tests with AVCHD2HQ >> 4 results good ..2 bad and unusable
I am sure, it is not my small D950 case, other (european) user with Q6600 >> same results
http://ediusforum.grassvalley.com/fo...ad.php?t=5474&

friendly greetings from europe\austria\vienna ..... old (but not dead) Hans ;-)