I have an HD 1920x1080 30P project that I made a blu-ray disc from using the "burn to disk" feature in Edius. I also made an H264 QT file from the timeline (15Mbps data rate).
I compared the two on my 55in HD TV - the edius disc played from a blu-ray player and the H264 file was uploaded to Vimeo then played out on my TV via a wireless Roku box through Vimeo on Demand. The H264 file looked a lot better.
Not sure why the H264 file looked better, actually looked great. The edius BR burn looked pixelated in the fine detail - not bad but not as good as the H264 file.
My project settings were ESX-E1 HD 1920x1080 29.97p over 59.94i to edit the project. Then I changed them to 59.94i to get the "burn to disc" option. The average bit rate was 22Mbs CBR since it was only a 53 min video. I would have thought the higher bit rate would look better. Any thoughts on this?
I compared the two on my 55in HD TV - the edius disc played from a blu-ray player and the H264 file was uploaded to Vimeo then played out on my TV via a wireless Roku box through Vimeo on Demand. The H264 file looked a lot better.
Not sure why the H264 file looked better, actually looked great. The edius BR burn looked pixelated in the fine detail - not bad but not as good as the H264 file.
My project settings were ESX-E1 HD 1920x1080 29.97p over 59.94i to edit the project. Then I changed them to 59.94i to get the "burn to disc" option. The average bit rate was 22Mbs CBR since it was only a 53 min video. I would have thought the higher bit rate would look better. Any thoughts on this?
Comment