Hi,
referring to a previous thread about fitting the NX into the Mac Pro… from a work flow point of view for full time professional users (broadcast industry) is this a reliable option?
I am thinking of moving to FCP as I’ve found Edius just does not have the quality I need for Broadcast (too many keying error, noise, no High-end tools and many other small problems that are costing us too much time and money). But we still have thousands, yes thousands of jobs that were built in Edius so the transition would be gradual. To be able to have the “best of both” worlds for a year or two would be a big advantage, but I need to know if it’s going to work. I don’t want the 20% downtime (with 4.51 45%) we currently get with our three PC Edius systems.
I’m also concerned about the “slower rendering time” of FCP that was mentioned. And why do people refuse to compare Edius with FCP?
And advice would be much appreciated.
referring to a previous thread about fitting the NX into the Mac Pro… from a work flow point of view for full time professional users (broadcast industry) is this a reliable option?
I am thinking of moving to FCP as I’ve found Edius just does not have the quality I need for Broadcast (too many keying error, noise, no High-end tools and many other small problems that are costing us too much time and money). But we still have thousands, yes thousands of jobs that were built in Edius so the transition would be gradual. To be able to have the “best of both” worlds for a year or two would be a big advantage, but I need to know if it’s going to work. I don’t want the 20% downtime (with 4.51 45%) we currently get with our three PC Edius systems.
I’m also concerned about the “slower rendering time” of FCP that was mentioned. And why do people refuse to compare Edius with FCP?
And advice would be much appreciated.
Comment