Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Capturing to CanopusHQ

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Capturing to CanopusHQ

    Using a Canon XH A1, what are people's opinion regarding the setting to use when capturing HDV to CanopusHQ Codec? Do you use "Standard" or "Fine" settings? I'm fairly sure that "Fine" will increase storage quite a bit and am wondering if it's worth the extra space? My final output will be to SD DVD.

    Many thanks
    Windows 10 Pro. Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming mainboard, Intel i7-8700K processor, 32GB DDR4 3200MHz RAM, Radeon R9 270 2GB DDR5 Graphics.
    Samsung SSD Drives for system and mixture of SSD and 7200 SATA for video storage.

    Edius 9.50. Blackmagic Intensity Pro 4k
    Dublin, Ireland. PAL.

  • #2
    "Fine" appears to make little difference to the file size and I just can't see the difference anyway - maybe for keying it helps - I always did "fine" but now standard is the order of the day - what does help is the editing experience with HQ, sooo much better than any mpeg file, especially with filters. I convert all my XDCAMHD files as they really slow things down.

    Paul
    Edius Edits at: http://www.vimeo.com/user781619/videos

    1) AMD 3900X 12 core 4.6Ghz 2) Asus X79 4930K 6 core @4.4GHz Water Cooled. 480GB REVO3x2 System drive, 4TB Raid 0, 4 TB E-Sata Raid 5, 32GB RAM, GTX1070Ti Decklink HD Extreme. 3X Sony AX53 Sony AX700 BMPCC 4K

    http://indiestereographer.blogspot.co.uk

    Comment


    • #3
      "Fine" uses a higher bitrate than that of regular HDCAM, and also an improved Quantization factor - the tradeoff is in filesize.

      Realistically speaking, you would only use "Fine" for uncompressed sources. You don't get something for nothing, as the saying goes.

      Comment

      Working...
      X