Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

sharpness Edius Monitor

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sharpness Edius Monitor

    Dear Edepts,
    Does anyone have an explanation for the fact that the picture in the Edius monitor seems to be less focused than on a TV Screen?
    Hans Lips
    Edius 8 user

    Motherboard: Intel Asusp9x79, processor intel core i7 4820k, KINGSTON VALUE 4x4Gb ddr3, Graphics Card Geforce 640GT(4Gb)

  • #2
    is Edius overlay set to direct draw or 3D?

    got a good graphics card?

    what is your Edius monitor, model number?
    Anton Strauss
    Antons Video Productions - Sydney

    EDIUS X WG with BM Mini Monitor 4k and BM Mini Recorder, Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro, Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, 32 Threads @ 4.3Ghz, Corsair Water Cooling, Gigabyte RTX-2070 Super 3X 8GB Video Card, Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD for System, 8TB Samsung Raid0 SSD for Video, 2 Pioneer BDR-209 Blu-ray/DVD burners, Hotswap Bay for 3.5" Sata and 2.5" SSD, Phanteks Enthoo Pro XL Tower, Corsair 32GB DDR4 Ram, Win10 Pro

    Comment


    • #3
      Or maybe you using too big Edius player window if your project is SD?
      Gintaras
      Edius 8.5/ 5.51, Panasonic hc-x1, Canon 5d3, Canon 550, JVC GZ-GX1 www.gintarasmockus.lt
      i7 3770k, 8 GB RAM, Gigabyte Z77-D3H, Geforce GTX 650 2 GB, 120 GB SSD, 2Ă—1 TB HDD, Win 7 HP 64

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by antonsvideo
        is Edius overlay set to direct draw or 3D?

        got a good graphics card?

        what is your Edius monitor, model number?
        Can you tell me what the difference is between direct draw or 3D?
        The other option is field or frame. Again, which is best for sharpness.
        graphics card is VGA ASUS 9600GT and monitors SamsungTFT20"T200
        Hans Lips
        Edius 8 user

        Motherboard: Intel Asusp9x79, processor intel core i7 4820k, KINGSTON VALUE 4x4Gb ddr3, Graphics Card Geforce 640GT(4Gb)

        Comment


        • #5
          3D = overlay generated by the graphics card

          direct draw = overlay generated by the PC processor (not as good)

          update period field = what you should use

          update period frame = looks very funny with ghosting and watery look during movement, I have no idea why to use this?
          Anton Strauss
          Antons Video Productions - Sydney

          EDIUS X WG with BM Mini Monitor 4k and BM Mini Recorder, Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro, Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, 32 Threads @ 4.3Ghz, Corsair Water Cooling, Gigabyte RTX-2070 Super 3X 8GB Video Card, Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD for System, 8TB Samsung Raid0 SSD for Video, 2 Pioneer BDR-209 Blu-ray/DVD burners, Hotswap Bay for 3.5" Sata and 2.5" SSD, Phanteks Enthoo Pro XL Tower, Corsair 32GB DDR4 Ram, Win10 Pro

          Comment


          • #6
            Anton, is that true for progressive projects too? Doesn't sound right to use fields when there aren't any....
            When I go out, I wear my EDIUS T-Shirt.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mattmatt
              Anton, is that true for progressive projects too? Doesn't sound right to use fields when there aren't any....
              I suppose progressive is a different story, I don't have any such files to test

              I can switch my XDCAM HD camera to progressive mode, however the result looks like flicker vision (like going to cinema), so I don't use progressive
              Anton Strauss
              Antons Video Productions - Sydney

              EDIUS X WG with BM Mini Monitor 4k and BM Mini Recorder, Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro, Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, 32 Threads @ 4.3Ghz, Corsair Water Cooling, Gigabyte RTX-2070 Super 3X 8GB Video Card, Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD for System, 8TB Samsung Raid0 SSD for Video, 2 Pioneer BDR-209 Blu-ray/DVD burners, Hotswap Bay for 3.5" Sata and 2.5" SSD, Phanteks Enthoo Pro XL Tower, Corsair 32GB DDR4 Ram, Win10 Pro

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by antonsvideo
                the result looks like flicker vision (like going to cinema), so I don't use progressive
                Until today I still don't get the hype about progressive / film look footage.
                What's so great about that ..............

                Comment


                • #9
                  If you don't get it then you probably don't need convincing.

                  It's project dependent - like all visual elements the decision to give a production a certain look is one that can be enabled with lighting, camera angles, location, in-camera settings, post-production etc. Progressive adds its name amongst these and re-creates the juddery motion of film (assuming a low framerate), and that implies a certain look.

                  For instance we shoot most docs in progressive, it's higher quality than interlace for a start and gives a timeless feel to the piece whilst embossing that film feel.

                  Also interlace is a restriction that harks back to the old days of making maximum use of broadcasting bandwidth - and comes with its own artefacts - that do not come with progressive.

                  Don't forget using higher framerates of progressive yields the best of both worlds in terms of temporal and spacial resolution - but that needs bandwidth.

                  (There are no fields in the native editing domain using 24/25p - however for output to a PAL or NTSC system fields are relevent - but not for editing.) Edius sorts all that out anyway.
                  Last edited by rone; 03-10-2009, 05:12 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This thread is going off topic (as per usual) but when you talk about progressive you really need to know if you are using the low frame rates 24/25/30p or higher rates 50/60p

                    the low rates are what gives the flicker film look.

                    The 50/60p should be flicker free and give the best 'normal' results -

                    I now use 50p mode all the time on my Sony EX1 as it gives the best smooth motion pictures for progressive displays ~ (plus also is also the best format for downconversion to DVD in SD as 50/60i would be de-interlaced in Edius 1st before getting re-interlaced at DVD frame size - can produce lots of jaggies)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The only 100% reliable display is from EDIUS-supported output hardware. On-screen preview is just that - preview. It'll get close, but it's not spot-on for what your viewer will see, unless your output is for PC playback, but even that won't be the same because of formats and individual computer settings.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by rone
                        It's project dependent - like all visual elements the decision to give a production a certain look
                        That part I do understand, it's just that lot's of so called videographers do progressive with low end cam's and just convince themselves that it looks great.

                        Must be my age catching up, I also don't enjoy all those extreme fast cut movies that jump from one special effect to another.

                        Back to topic ....................

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X
                        😀
                        🥰
                        🤢
                        😎
                        😡
                        👍
                        👎