Remember that digital video, both DV and MPEG, uses the YUV domain.
If you look at the U and V planes captured via composite - vs - captured via S-video, there is a huge difference, even for a VHS source. The composite version has very messy edges, while the S-video version has clean edges.
The difference is much harder to see on the full colour video (that's why people were happy with composite for so long!) BUT your MPEG-2 encoder (assuming your final output is DVD) may have a much easier time encoding the clean UV planes from S-video than encoding the messy UV planes from a composite capture.
My comparisons are with PAL. Maybe the ADVC's comb filter on NTSC makes composite captures cleaner.
Cheers,
David.
If you look at the U and V planes captured via composite - vs - captured via S-video, there is a huge difference, even for a VHS source. The composite version has very messy edges, while the S-video version has clean edges.
The difference is much harder to see on the full colour video (that's why people were happy with composite for so long!) BUT your MPEG-2 encoder (assuming your final output is DVD) may have a much easier time encoding the clean UV planes from S-video than encoding the messy UV planes from a composite capture.
My comparisons are with PAL. Maybe the ADVC's comb filter on NTSC makes composite captures cleaner.
Cheers,
David.
Comment